<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1477 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240300</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD dismissed the application for rectification of mistake regarding the appointment of the adjudicating authority in the Final Order. The Tribunal found that the alleged mistake was not apparent on the record as the notification relied upon was not presented during the initial proceedings. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the original order, emphasizing the lack of evidence to support the rectification application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2013 05:46:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1477 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240300</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD dismissed the application for rectification of mistake regarding the appointment of the adjudicating authority in the Final Order. The Tribunal found that the alleged mistake was not apparent on the record as the notification relied upon was not presented during the initial proceedings. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the original order, emphasizing the lack of evidence to support the rectification application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>