<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1476 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240299</link>
    <description>An import-policy condition requiring new motor cars to be imported from the country of manufacture was enforced strictly, so shipment through or invoicing via another country did not satisfy the requirement and confiscation was justified for that breach. By contrast, where the required homologation or type approval/COP certificate could not be obtained from the specified accredited agency, the law did not require performance of an impossible act, so non-production of that certificate could not support confiscation. As a result, the monetary consequences were moderated: redemption fine and penalty were reduced, while confiscation for violation of the country-of-manufacture condition was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2013 05:46:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1476 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240299</link>
      <description>An import-policy condition requiring new motor cars to be imported from the country of manufacture was enforced strictly, so shipment through or invoicing via another country did not satisfy the requirement and confiscation was justified for that breach. By contrast, where the required homologation or type approval/COP certificate could not be obtained from the specified accredited agency, the law did not require performance of an impossible act, so non-production of that certificate could not support confiscation. As a result, the monetary consequences were moderated: redemption fine and penalty were reduced, while confiscation for violation of the country-of-manufacture condition was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>