<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1470 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240293</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI confirmed duty demand and penalty imposition for the period July 02 to March 03 on a manufacturer of tractors and parts. The tribunal dismissed the appeal by the Revenue due to lack of clarity in quantifying duty based on notional advertisement charges without proper basis, emphasizing the need for transparent calculation methodologies in duty demands involving additional expenses like advertisement charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1470 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240293</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI confirmed duty demand and penalty imposition for the period July 02 to March 03 on a manufacturer of tractors and parts. The tribunal dismissed the appeal by the Revenue due to lack of clarity in quantifying duty based on notional advertisement charges without proper basis, emphasizing the need for transparent calculation methodologies in duty demands involving additional expenses like advertisement charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>