<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1464 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240287</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI, in a case involving duty demand and penalties against M/s Rico Auto Industries Ltd. and M/s Agsons Agencies India Pvt. Ltd., set aside the demands and penalties imposed by the Commissioner. The Tribunal found that despite procedural lapses in record-keeping, there was no evidence of malpractice or diversion of materials, as all received goods were utilized in the manufacturing process. The judgment emphasized the importance of accurate documentation and the necessity of substantial evidence to substantiate allegations of duty evasion, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 17:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1464 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240287</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI, in a case involving duty demand and penalties against M/s Rico Auto Industries Ltd. and M/s Agsons Agencies India Pvt. Ltd., set aside the demands and penalties imposed by the Commissioner. The Tribunal found that despite procedural lapses in record-keeping, there was no evidence of malpractice or diversion of materials, as all received goods were utilized in the manufacturing process. The judgment emphasized the importance of accurate documentation and the necessity of substantial evidence to substantiate allegations of duty evasion, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>