<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 555 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159699</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment, emphasizing the necessity of strict compliance with the statutory requirements of Section 138 regarding the service of notice. The appeal was allowed, and the complaint was deemed invalid due to the premature filing and improper service of notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 555 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159699</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment, emphasizing the necessity of strict compliance with the statutory requirements of Section 138 regarding the service of notice. The appeal was allowed, and the complaint was deemed invalid due to the premature filing and improper service of notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>