<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 419 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159690</link>
    <description>The concessional tax rate for packing materials was confined to materials used for packing goods covered by the registration certificate and intended for use in the manufacture of taxable goods for sale. The phrase &quot;so specified&quot; was read as linking the packing-material condition to that taxable-goods requirement, so mere inclusion of the goods in the certificate was insufficient. On that construction, packing materials used for tax-free hosiery goods did not satisfy the statutory condition, and rule 27A(1a) did not widen the concession. The refusal of declaration forms and concessional treatment was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 15:34:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 419 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159690</link>
      <description>The concessional tax rate for packing materials was confined to materials used for packing goods covered by the registration certificate and intended for use in the manufacture of taxable goods for sale. The phrase &quot;so specified&quot; was read as linking the packing-material condition to that taxable-goods requirement, so mere inclusion of the goods in the certificate was insufficient. On that construction, packing materials used for tax-free hosiery goods did not satisfy the statutory condition, and rule 27A(1a) did not widen the concession. The refusal of declaration forms and concessional treatment was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>