<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (1) TMI 503 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159684</link>
    <description>Promissory estoppel barred the State from amending an industrial sales tax incentive scheme to exclude oil extraction and manufacturing units after the assessee had altered its position by acquiring land, investing in construction and machinery, and commencing production in reliance on the government promise. The Rajasthan HC held that the subsequent amendment could not operate to the detriment of accrued benefits, and the plea of public interest was insufficient on these facts to defeat the promisee&#039;s entitlement. The writ petition succeeded, the amending notification was quashed, and entitlement under the earlier incentive schemes was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 14:50:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (1) TMI 503 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159684</link>
      <description>Promissory estoppel barred the State from amending an industrial sales tax incentive scheme to exclude oil extraction and manufacturing units after the assessee had altered its position by acquiring land, investing in construction and machinery, and commencing production in reliance on the government promise. The Rajasthan HC held that the subsequent amendment could not operate to the detriment of accrued benefits, and the plea of public interest was insufficient on these facts to defeat the promisee&#039;s entitlement. The writ petition succeeded, the amending notification was quashed, and entitlement under the earlier incentive schemes was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>