https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240283 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s Swapnashilp Travels, regarding the demand of service tax and penalty. The Tribunal found that the services provided by the appellant, as per the work order terms for transporting answer sheets for Nagpur University, did not constitute "Rent-a-Cab scheme operator" services under the Finance Act, 1994. Consequently, the demand for service tax and penalty was set aside, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. en-us Wed, 23 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Feb 2017 12:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240283 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s Swapnashilp Travels, regarding the demand of service tax and penalty. The Tribunal found that the services provided by the appellant, as per the work order terms for transporting answer sheets for Nagpur University, did not constitute "Rent-a-Cab scheme operator" services under the Finance Act, 1994. Consequently, the demand for service tax and penalty was set aside, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 23 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240283