<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1458 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240281</link>
    <description>The appellant challenged a service tax demand for Business Auxiliary Service, Club or Association Service, Manpower Recruitment or Agency Service, and Intellectual Property Service. The Tribunal found the assessment unsustainable for Business Auxiliary Service due to lack of breakdown, supported the appellant&#039;s stance on Club or Association Service, raised concerns about accuracy in Manpower Recruitment or Agency Service assessment, and granted relief for Intellectual Property Service, allowing a waiver of pre-deposit and staying further proceedings pending payment of the balance tax. The judgment addressed discrepancies in assessments and provided relief based on evidence and legal arguments presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 15:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1458 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240281</link>
      <description>The appellant challenged a service tax demand for Business Auxiliary Service, Club or Association Service, Manpower Recruitment or Agency Service, and Intellectual Property Service. The Tribunal found the assessment unsustainable for Business Auxiliary Service due to lack of breakdown, supported the appellant&#039;s stance on Club or Association Service, raised concerns about accuracy in Manpower Recruitment or Agency Service assessment, and granted relief for Intellectual Property Service, allowing a waiver of pre-deposit and staying further proceedings pending payment of the balance tax. The judgment addressed discrepancies in assessments and provided relief based on evidence and legal arguments presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>