<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1442 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240265</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. It held that the amounts surrendered under the Amnesty Scheme in the names of minors who had become major and the undisclosed income found during the search operation were not to be included in the assessee&#039;s taxable income. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the additions from the income and the imposition of penalties were overturned in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 07:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1442 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240265</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. It held that the amounts surrendered under the Amnesty Scheme in the names of minors who had become major and the undisclosed income found during the search operation were not to be included in the assessee&#039;s taxable income. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the additions from the income and the imposition of penalties were overturned in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>