<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1439 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240262</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) orders, and remanded the matter back to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for a decision on merits after providing a hearing opportunity. The Court found that the Tribunal&#039;s decision to decline condonation of delay was inappropriate, emphasizing the inconsistency in the Tribunal&#039;s decisions and the need to apply similar reasoning in comparable cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 06:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1439 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240262</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) orders, and remanded the matter back to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for a decision on merits after providing a hearing opportunity. The Court found that the Tribunal&#039;s decision to decline condonation of delay was inappropriate, emphasizing the inconsistency in the Tribunal&#039;s decisions and the need to apply similar reasoning in comparable cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>