<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1432 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240255</link>
    <description>The CIT (A)&#039;s order was upheld, and the appeal filed by the department was dismissed. The CIT (A) correctly deleted the addition of Rs. 8,13,31,097/- made by the AO, as the stock statement submitted to the bank was on an estimate basis and the books of accounts were not rejected. The addition under Section 69 was not applicable, and the explanation provided by the assessee regarding the discrepancy in stock valuation was accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 06:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1432 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240255</link>
      <description>The CIT (A)&#039;s order was upheld, and the appeal filed by the department was dismissed. The CIT (A) correctly deleted the addition of Rs. 8,13,31,097/- made by the AO, as the stock statement submitted to the bank was on an estimate basis and the books of accounts were not rejected. The addition under Section 69 was not applicable, and the explanation provided by the assessee regarding the discrepancy in stock valuation was accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>