<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1424 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240247</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Applicant to deposit 25% of the confirmed duty within eight weeks for clandestine manufacture and removal of goods without duty payment totaling Rs.3.04 crore. Failure to comply would result in dismissal of all Appeals due to conflicting claims and the need for detailed evidence analysis before a final judgment. The Revenue&#039;s reliance on various evidence, including data from a pen-drive, supported their allegations, while the Applicants contested the evidence&#039;s admissibility and ownership of the premises where the data was found. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of further examination while balancing the interests of both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 06:16:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1424 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240247</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Applicant to deposit 25% of the confirmed duty within eight weeks for clandestine manufacture and removal of goods without duty payment totaling Rs.3.04 crore. Failure to comply would result in dismissal of all Appeals due to conflicting claims and the need for detailed evidence analysis before a final judgment. The Revenue&#039;s reliance on various evidence, including data from a pen-drive, supported their allegations, while the Applicants contested the evidence&#039;s admissibility and ownership of the premises where the data was found. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of further examination while balancing the interests of both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>