<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 570 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159650</link>
    <description>Where the entire ownership of a dealer&#039;s business is transferred, the transferee becomes liable for unpaid sales tax attributable to that business. A sale of industrial assets on an &quot;as is where is&quot; basis was treated as transfer of the whole business, so the auction purchaser stepped into the defaulting unit&#039;s position despite the absence of stock, goodwill, employees or continuing operations. The sales tax statute also created a first charge on the dealer&#039;s property for tax dues, and that charge followed the property into the purchaser&#039;s hands. Private contractual terms could not defeat the statutory charge, and the charge remained enforceable against the transferred assets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 17:17:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 570 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159650</link>
      <description>Where the entire ownership of a dealer&#039;s business is transferred, the transferee becomes liable for unpaid sales tax attributable to that business. A sale of industrial assets on an &quot;as is where is&quot; basis was treated as transfer of the whole business, so the auction purchaser stepped into the defaulting unit&#039;s position despite the absence of stock, goodwill, employees or continuing operations. The sales tax statute also created a first charge on the dealer&#039;s property for tax dues, and that charge followed the property into the purchaser&#039;s hands. Private contractual terms could not defeat the statutory charge, and the charge remained enforceable against the transferred assets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>