https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159645 A stay order directing deposit of 50% of the disputed tax was found unsustainable because it gave no reasons for refusing full stay despite reliance on an earlier judgment. The HC interfered with the order, quashed it, and protected the assessee from recovery action while the appeal remained pending. It also directed the appellate authority to dispose of the appeal within two months, ensuring expeditious adjudication alongside interim protection. en-us Thu, 31 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Nov 2013 17:04:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159645 A stay order directing deposit of 50% of the disputed tax was found unsustainable because it gave no reasons for refusing full stay despite reliance on an earlier judgment. The HC interfered with the order, quashed it, and protected the assessee from recovery action while the appeal remained pending. It also directed the appellate authority to dispose of the appeal within two months, ensuring expeditious adjudication alongside interim protection. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 31 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159645