<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 583 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159623</link>
    <description>Imported artificial fur fabric did not qualify for sales tax exemption because the Third Schedule restricted item 16 to knitted or crocheted fabrics produced or manufactured in India. The declared-goods argument also failed, as the relevant Central Sales Tax and excise references applied to goods manufactured in India and liable to excise, whereas the imported goods had only borne customs duty. The distinction between locally manufactured and imported goods was treated as a reasonable basis for tax classification, so the article 14 challenge to the impugned entries was rejected and the exemption restriction was upheld as valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 15:01:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 583 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159623</link>
      <description>Imported artificial fur fabric did not qualify for sales tax exemption because the Third Schedule restricted item 16 to knitted or crocheted fabrics produced or manufactured in India. The declared-goods argument also failed, as the relevant Central Sales Tax and excise references applied to goods manufactured in India and liable to excise, whereas the imported goods had only borne customs duty. The distinction between locally manufactured and imported goods was treated as a reasonable basis for tax classification, so the article 14 challenge to the impugned entries was rejected and the exemption restriction was upheld as valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>