<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1397 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240220</link>
    <description>The appeal against the Order-in-Appeal for waiving pre-deposit was rejected due to delay in filing and failure to provide required documents. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the recovery order under the Customs Act and imposed a penalty. The appellant&#039;s argument of non-receipt of the Order-in-Original was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of timely appeals and proper service. The judgment highlighted compliance with statutory timelines, leading to the rejection of the appeal based on limitation issues and lack of merit. The appellant was directed to deposit the claimed amount and penalty within a specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1397 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240220</link>
      <description>The appeal against the Order-in-Appeal for waiving pre-deposit was rejected due to delay in filing and failure to provide required documents. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the recovery order under the Customs Act and imposed a penalty. The appellant&#039;s argument of non-receipt of the Order-in-Original was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of timely appeals and proper service. The judgment highlighted compliance with statutory timelines, leading to the rejection of the appeal based on limitation issues and lack of merit. The appellant was directed to deposit the claimed amount and penalty within a specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>