https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240210 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in the dispute over the correct classification of Nestea Tea premix under the CETA. The demand within the limitation period was confirmed, and the penalty was annulled due to the absence of malafide intent. The appeal was disposed of with the demand within the limitation period confirmed, interest paid, and the penalty set aside. en-us Tue, 13 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jan 2014 14:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240210 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in the dispute over the correct classification of Nestea Tea premix under the CETA. The demand within the limitation period was confirmed, and the penalty was annulled due to the absence of malafide intent. The appeal was disposed of with the demand within the limitation period confirmed, interest paid, and the penalty set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 13 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240210