<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1385 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240208</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of relevant documents and proper evaluation of each case based on its unique circumstances. The Tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to assess the refund claim based on the provided documents, highlighting the significance of the price variation clause in the contract for determining eligibility for a refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 11:25:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1385 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240208</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of relevant documents and proper evaluation of each case based on its unique circumstances. The Tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to assess the refund claim based on the provided documents, highlighting the significance of the price variation clause in the contract for determining eligibility for a refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>