https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159606 In preventive detention matters, non-supply of legal advice or every requested detail does not vitiate detention where Article 22(5) grounds are communicated and a representation can be made. Delay between the incident and the detention order is not fatal if it is satisfactorily explained by continuing investigation and recording of statements. The availability of ordinary criminal prosecution does not bar preventive detention where the authority considers prosecution insufficient to prevent future prejudicial conduct. Confidential executive guidelines do not control statutory detention power, and mala fides or discrimination are not established where the order rests on conduct, concealment, quantity of contraband, and a reasonable prognosis of repetition. en-us Fri, 30 Oct 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Aug 2014 17:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159606 In preventive detention matters, non-supply of legal advice or every requested detail does not vitiate detention where Article 22(5) grounds are communicated and a representation can be made. Delay between the incident and the detention order is not fatal if it is satisfactorily explained by continuing investigation and recording of statements. The availability of ordinary criminal prosecution does not bar preventive detention where the authority considers prosecution insufficient to prevent future prejudicial conduct. Confidential executive guidelines do not control statutory detention power, and mala fides or discrimination are not established where the order rests on conduct, concealment, quantity of contraband, and a reasonable prognosis of repetition. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 30 Oct 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159606