https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159605 Where an arbitration clause names a particular officer by office as arbitrator, a civil court cannot revoke that contractual authority or substitute an independent arbitrator unless legally sufficient grounds are proved, such as misconduct, fraud or disqualification. Consent adjournments and ongoing proceedings showed no neglect of duty by the named arbitrator, so there was no basis for judicial interference. The court therefore lacked jurisdiction to displace the contractual arbitrator without the parties' consent, and the order appointing another arbitrator was set aside. en-us Fri, 28 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159605 Where an arbitration clause names a particular officer by office as arbitrator, a civil court cannot revoke that contractual authority or substitute an independent arbitrator unless legally sufficient grounds are proved, such as misconduct, fraud or disqualification. Consent adjournments and ongoing proceedings showed no neglect of duty by the named arbitrator, so there was no basis for judicial interference. The court therefore lacked jurisdiction to displace the contractual arbitrator without the parties' consent, and the order appointing another arbitrator was set aside. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 28 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159605