<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1377 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240200</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the income tax appeal, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under Section 271 (1) (c) due to the revenue department&#039;s failure to establish concealment of income through a detailed enquiry. The Court emphasized the importance of proper investigation and providing the assessee with an opportunity to explain, highlighting the penal nature of penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 00:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1377 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240200</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the income tax appeal, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under Section 271 (1) (c) due to the revenue department&#039;s failure to establish concealment of income through a detailed enquiry. The Court emphasized the importance of proper investigation and providing the assessee with an opportunity to explain, highlighting the penal nature of penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>