<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (12) TMI 318 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159593</link>
    <description>Renewal of an eligibility certificate could not stand where the applicants were not supplied copies of the inspection reports relied upon to renewal, because they were denied an effective opportunity to meet the adverse material. The fairness defect in the decision-making process required the matter to be reconsidered after disclosure of the reports and a further hearing. The refusal was therefore set aside in its existing form and remitted for rehearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 17:12:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (12) TMI 318 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159593</link>
      <description>Renewal of an eligibility certificate could not stand where the applicants were not supplied copies of the inspection reports relied upon to renewal, because they were denied an effective opportunity to meet the adverse material. The fairness defect in the decision-making process required the matter to be reconsidered after disclosure of the reports and a further hearing. The refusal was therefore set aside in its existing form and remitted for rehearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>