<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 381 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159588</link>
    <description>Benzene hexachloride 50 per cent W.D.P. was held not to be a medicine for exemption under rule 24 of the M.P. General Sales Tax Rules, 1959. The court applied the common and commercial meaning of &quot;medicine&quot; as a substance taken internally or applied externally for treating human or animal disease, and distinguished the product as an insecticide used for spraying marshy, waterlogged areas to destroy malaria-carrying germs. Reference to a malaria eradication certificate did not change its character or justify the exemption. The result was that the deduction for sales of medicines to specified bodies was unavailable and the issue was decided for the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:51:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 381 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159588</link>
      <description>Benzene hexachloride 50 per cent W.D.P. was held not to be a medicine for exemption under rule 24 of the M.P. General Sales Tax Rules, 1959. The court applied the common and commercial meaning of &quot;medicine&quot; as a substance taken internally or applied externally for treating human or animal disease, and distinguished the product as an insecticide used for spraying marshy, waterlogged areas to destroy malaria-carrying germs. Reference to a malaria eradication certificate did not change its character or justify the exemption. The result was that the deduction for sales of medicines to specified bodies was unavailable and the issue was decided for the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>