<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 432 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159567</link>
    <description>After amendment of section 12(3) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, a penalty could be imposed by a separate order where suppression of turnover or other statutory conditions justified it. The absence of a penalty in the original assessment order did not prevent a succeeding assessing officer from initiating and completing penalty proceedings under the amended provision. The earlier pre-amendment ruling relied on by the assessee was held inapplicable because it concerned the unamended law, and the amended-provision Division Bench ruling was followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 15:00:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 432 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159567</link>
      <description>After amendment of section 12(3) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, a penalty could be imposed by a separate order where suppression of turnover or other statutory conditions justified it. The absence of a penalty in the original assessment order did not prevent a succeeding assessing officer from initiating and completing penalty proceedings under the amended provision. The earlier pre-amendment ruling relied on by the assessee was held inapplicable because it concerned the unamended law, and the amended-provision Division Bench ruling was followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>