<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 336 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159564</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decision of the Appellate Tribunal, ruling that the G.P. sheets purchased by the assessee underwent a manufacturing process, resulting in a commercially distinct product different from the original material. The judgment highlighted the legal principles guiding such cases and dismissed the tax revision case, affirming the denial of the exemption claimed by the assessee for the second sale of G.P. sheets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:40:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 336 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159564</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decision of the Appellate Tribunal, ruling that the G.P. sheets purchased by the assessee underwent a manufacturing process, resulting in a commercially distinct product different from the original material. The judgment highlighted the legal principles guiding such cases and dismissed the tax revision case, affirming the denial of the exemption claimed by the assessee for the second sale of G.P. sheets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>