https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159562 A party that consents in court to the appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot later repudiate that concession and insist on the contractual appointment mechanism. The arbitration agreement contemplated appointment through the contract, but no appointment was secured within the stipulated time, and counsel did not object when the High Court named the arbitrator. The court treated the recorded concession as binding on the represented party, found no basis to say it was unauthorised, and held that the party had waived reliance on the contractual objection. The challenge to the appointment was therefore rejected. en-us Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jun 2014 20:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159562 A party that consents in court to the appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot later repudiate that concession and insist on the contractual appointment mechanism. The arbitration agreement contemplated appointment through the contract, but no appointment was secured within the stipulated time, and counsel did not object when the High Court named the arbitrator. The court treated the recorded concession as binding on the represented party, found no basis to say it was unauthorised, and held that the party had waived reliance on the contractual objection. The challenge to the appointment was therefore rejected. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159562