<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (11) TMI 250 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159555</link>
    <description>Section 25 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 could be invoked only to recover amounts already due as arrears of tax or other sums, and liability arose only after an assessment order and the consequential demand notice were served. Because no assessment order or demand notice had been issued, no amount could be treated as due from the dealer. The notice freezing payments and insisting on a clearance certificate was also issued despite a subsisting court stay on recovery proceedings, so the exercise of power was improper and without authority. The notice was therefore unauthorised and illegal, and its quashing was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:55:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (11) TMI 250 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159555</link>
      <description>Section 25 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 could be invoked only to recover amounts already due as arrears of tax or other sums, and liability arose only after an assessment order and the consequential demand notice were served. Because no assessment order or demand notice had been issued, no amount could be treated as due from the dealer. The notice freezing payments and insisting on a clearance certificate was also issued despite a subsisting court stay on recovery proceedings, so the exercise of power was improper and without authority. The notice was therefore unauthorised and illegal, and its quashing was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>