<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1362 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240185</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on supplementary invoices was examined with reference to Rule 9(1)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, for a period before Rule 9(1)(bb) came into force. The Tribunal recorded that the show cause notice relied on Rule 9(1)(b) and that the restrictive bar in Rule 9(1)(bb) applied only from 1 April 2011. On that basis, it treated Rule 9(1)(b) as inapplicable to the disputed period and accepted that the appellant had made out a case for total waiver of the dues, resulting in waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1362 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240185</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on supplementary invoices was examined with reference to Rule 9(1)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, for a period before Rule 9(1)(bb) came into force. The Tribunal recorded that the show cause notice relied on Rule 9(1)(b) and that the restrictive bar in Rule 9(1)(bb) applied only from 1 April 2011. On that basis, it treated Rule 9(1)(b) as inapplicable to the disputed period and accepted that the appellant had made out a case for total waiver of the dues, resulting in waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>