<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 380 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159545</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the extended period of limitation and inclusion of notional interest in the assessable value. However, the Court ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the deduction of trade discounts, allowing them to deduct the trade discount from the gross price. The appellant&#039;s liability for the demanded duty was to be recalculated accordingly, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 18:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 380 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159545</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the extended period of limitation and inclusion of notional interest in the assessable value. However, the Court ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the deduction of trade discounts, allowing them to deduct the trade discount from the gross price. The appellant&#039;s liability for the demanded duty was to be recalculated accordingly, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>