<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 669 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159533</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the application for appointment of an arbitrator due to the existing injunction, the prematurity of the application, and disputes falling outside the arbitration agreement involving third parties. The court highlighted the importance of respecting judicial comity, enforcing valid contracts, and following agreed procedures for arbitration appointments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 09:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 669 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159533</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the application for appointment of an arbitrator due to the existing injunction, the prematurity of the application, and disputes falling outside the arbitration agreement involving third parties. The court highlighted the importance of respecting judicial comity, enforcing valid contracts, and following agreed procedures for arbitration appointments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>