<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1354 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240177</link>
    <description>The Tribunal proceeded with a direct appeal hearing after dismissing the stay application filed by the Revenue. The appeal concerned a dispute over a refund claim for imported goods, specifically Tin Plate sheets-waste, under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus. The Revenue contested discrepancies in goods descriptions between the sale invoice and Bill of Entry. The Tribunal held that minor discrepancies did not invalidate the refund claim. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the authenticity of the Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate, relying on relevant circulars. Ultimately, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1354 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240177</link>
      <description>The Tribunal proceeded with a direct appeal hearing after dismissing the stay application filed by the Revenue. The appeal concerned a dispute over a refund claim for imported goods, specifically Tin Plate sheets-waste, under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus. The Revenue contested discrepancies in goods descriptions between the sale invoice and Bill of Entry. The Tribunal held that minor discrepancies did not invalidate the refund claim. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the authenticity of the Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate, relying on relevant circulars. Ultimately, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>