<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1350 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240173</link>
    <description>The customs notifications on anti-dumping duty were construed by reference to their scope and the tolerance clause. A (+) 30 mm tolerance was treated as applying only where consignments were actually within the 1250 mm ceiling but were declared marginally above it, to prevent circumvention of the levy. Goods found to be more than 1250 mm wide were held to fall outside the notified product coverage, so anti-dumping duty was not payable. As duty was not attracted, the alleged misdeclaration could not sustain confiscation, redemption fine or penalties, which were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1350 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240173</link>
      <description>The customs notifications on anti-dumping duty were construed by reference to their scope and the tolerance clause. A (+) 30 mm tolerance was treated as applying only where consignments were actually within the 1250 mm ceiling but were declared marginally above it, to prevent circumvention of the levy. Goods found to be more than 1250 mm wide were held to fall outside the notified product coverage, so anti-dumping duty was not payable. As duty was not attracted, the alleged misdeclaration could not sustain confiscation, redemption fine or penalties, which were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>