<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1348 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240171</link>
    <description>The court granted the company&#039;s application under Section 466 of the Companies Act for a permanent stay of the winding-up petition. The company made partial payments to certain creditors and was directed to pay the remaining principal amount due to one creditor within a specified period. The dispute over interest payment was unresolved, with the court emphasizing the company&#039;s financial solvency and the need to address genuine disputes through civil proceedings. The court also ordered the company to reimburse the official liquidator for expenses incurred due to the winding-up petition within a week to maintain the stay order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 01:39:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1348 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240171</link>
      <description>The court granted the company&#039;s application under Section 466 of the Companies Act for a permanent stay of the winding-up petition. The company made partial payments to certain creditors and was directed to pay the remaining principal amount due to one creditor within a specified period. The dispute over interest payment was unresolved, with the court emphasizing the company&#039;s financial solvency and the need to address genuine disputes through civil proceedings. The court also ordered the company to reimburse the official liquidator for expenses incurred due to the winding-up petition within a week to maintain the stay order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>