https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240161 Conflicting material on the quantum of proportionate CENVAT credit reversed on common inputs used in exempted and dutiable goods justified fresh examination. The adjudicating record was inconsistent with the jurisdictional Superintendent's report obtained through RTI, which appeared to the reversal for part of the period and did not support the demand as confirmed. In view of this uncertainty, the appellate forum remitted the matter to the Commissioner for reconsideration of all issues afresh, with both sides permitted to rely on the report and the appellant to be heard. en-us Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Nov 2013 01:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240161 Conflicting material on the quantum of proportionate CENVAT credit reversed on common inputs used in exempted and dutiable goods justified fresh examination. The adjudicating record was inconsistent with the jurisdictional Superintendent's report obtained through RTI, which appeared to the reversal for part of the period and did not support the demand as confirmed. In view of this uncertainty, the appellate forum remitted the matter to the Commissioner for reconsideration of all issues afresh, with both sides permitted to rely on the report and the appellant to be heard. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240161