<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Firm BVRE&#039;s legality assessed: 12 persons involved, considering dual roles as &quot;one person&quot; under Companies Act, Section 11(2).</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=16092</link>
    <description>Legality of existence of firm BVRE – number of persons vis-à-vis 4 HUFs would be 12 (15 – 3). Since Sec.11(2) of Companies Act, 1956 uses expression “Person”, number of persons who have signed partnership deed in two capacities have to be reckoned as “one person” - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 00:46:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 00:46:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Firm BVRE&#039;s legality assessed: 12 persons involved, considering dual roles as &quot;one person&quot; under Companies Act, Section 11(2).</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=16092</link>
      <description>Legality of existence of firm BVRE – number of persons vis-à-vis 4 HUFs would be 12 (15 – 3). Since Sec.11(2) of Companies Act, 1956 uses expression “Person”, number of persons who have signed partnership deed in two capacities have to be reckoned as “one person” - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 00:46:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=16092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>