<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1314 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240137</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai excluded certain comparables in the TNMM transfer pricing analysis. Vishal Information Technologies Ltd was excluded as it outsourced a significant portion of its business, unlike the assessee. CMC Limited was rejected because its related party transactions exceeded 25% of total revenue, following the principle that comparables must have RPTs below this threshold. R Systems International Ltd was excluded due to mismatched financial year-ends with the assessee, as comparability requires identical year-end periods to avoid data distortion. These exclusions ensured only appropriate comparables were used for accurate transfer pricing determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 15:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1314 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240137</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai excluded certain comparables in the TNMM transfer pricing analysis. Vishal Information Technologies Ltd was excluded as it outsourced a significant portion of its business, unlike the assessee. CMC Limited was rejected because its related party transactions exceeded 25% of total revenue, following the principle that comparables must have RPTs below this threshold. R Systems International Ltd was excluded due to mismatched financial year-ends with the assessee, as comparability requires identical year-end periods to avoid data distortion. These exclusions ensured only appropriate comparables were used for accurate transfer pricing determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>