https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159530 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the dealer, determining that the sales of vanaspati to the Canteen Stores Department were local sales and exempt from sales tax under the Delhi Sales Tax Rules. The Tribunal also found that the sales were exempt from the levy of sales tax under section 8(2A) of the Central Sales Tax Act. The validity of review proceedings by the notified authority was challenged but deemed unnecessary to address as the sales were determined to be local and exempt from sales tax, following precedent set in previous cases. en-us Tue, 11 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Nov 2013 18:20:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159530 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the dealer, determining that the sales of vanaspati to the Canteen Stores Department were local sales and exempt from sales tax under the Delhi Sales Tax Rules. The Tribunal also found that the sales were exempt from the levy of sales tax under section 8(2A) of the Central Sales Tax Act. The validity of review proceedings by the notified authority was challenged but deemed unnecessary to address as the sales were determined to be local and exempt from sales tax, following precedent set in previous cases. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 11 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159530