<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 365 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159529</link>
    <description>Transport charges separately shown in the purchase order and contract were treated as part of a distinct transportation arrangement, not the sale price. On that construction, the charges were incurred after the sale, the commodity was sold ex-godown, and they were deductible from taxable turnover. The court also held that the final fact-finding authority&#039;s interpretation was neither perverse nor wholly unreasonable, and where two views were possible, the view favourable to the assessee had to be adopted. The revision therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 18:19:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 365 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159529</link>
      <description>Transport charges separately shown in the purchase order and contract were treated as part of a distinct transportation arrangement, not the sale price. On that construction, the charges were incurred after the sale, the commodity was sold ex-godown, and they were deductible from taxable turnover. The court also held that the final fact-finding authority&#039;s interpretation was neither perverse nor wholly unreasonable, and where two views were possible, the view favourable to the assessee had to be adopted. The revision therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>