<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 349 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159507</link>
    <description>The court partly allowed both petitions, issuing a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to reconsider the cases of the petitioners within two months. The court emphasized maintaining the status quo until a decision is communicated, considering the interpretation of the 1980 resolution, the impact of the circulars, and the factual circumstances presented by the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:25:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 349 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159507</link>
      <description>The court partly allowed both petitions, issuing a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to reconsider the cases of the petitioners within two months. The court emphasized maintaining the status quo until a decision is communicated, considering the interpretation of the 1980 resolution, the impact of the circulars, and the factual circumstances presented by the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>