<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (7) TMI 333 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159505</link>
    <description>Disputes between State departments and public sector instrumentalities over recovery of tax dues and enforcement of a mortgage should be resolved first through administrative consultation rather than litigation. The commentary notes that where assets have been transferred in exercise of powers under the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, competing revenue recovery efforts should be balanced against the corporation&#039;s security interest in public funds. It further states that confirmation of the auction was stayed pending a decision by the concerned State Secretaries, so that rival State claims could be adjusted without defeating the existing mortgage or forcing interdepartmental litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:55:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (7) TMI 333 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159505</link>
      <description>Disputes between State departments and public sector instrumentalities over recovery of tax dues and enforcement of a mortgage should be resolved first through administrative consultation rather than litigation. The commentary notes that where assets have been transferred in exercise of powers under the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, competing revenue recovery efforts should be balanced against the corporation&#039;s security interest in public funds. It further states that confirmation of the auction was stayed pending a decision by the concerned State Secretaries, so that rival State claims could be adjusted without defeating the existing mortgage or forcing interdepartmental litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>