<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (3) TMI 341 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159501</link>
    <description>Where no best judgment assessment had been made and no proper return was filed, the turnover was treated as escaped assessment, making section 12 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 applicable. On that basis, the eight-year limitation under section 12(2) governed the earlier assessment years, so the proposed assessment for those years was time-barred and liable to be quashed. The objection that the writ petition was premature was rejected because the matter had already been entertained and heard on merits, and the petitioner could not then be relegated to the assessing authority for want of an earlier statutory response. The later assessment years were left open to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:37:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (3) TMI 341 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159501</link>
      <description>Where no best judgment assessment had been made and no proper return was filed, the turnover was treated as escaped assessment, making section 12 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 applicable. On that basis, the eight-year limitation under section 12(2) governed the earlier assessment years, so the proposed assessment for those years was time-barred and liable to be quashed. The objection that the writ petition was premature was rejected because the matter had already been entertained and heard on merits, and the petitioner could not then be relegated to the assessing authority for want of an earlier statutory response. The later assessment years were left open to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>