https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159497 Writ jurisdiction was held inappropriate for challenging the tax assessment because an efficacious statutory revision remedy was available and the dispute involved factual questions better left to the departmental authorities. The assessment orders were therefore not interfered with, and the petitioner was relegated to the statutory forum. By contrast, the recovery demand notices and bank account attachments were quashed because the statutory protection and the limited period remaining after service of the appellate order made immediate coercive action premature. Liberty was reserved to proceed in accordance with law after expiry of the statutory period. en-us Tue, 21 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:21:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159497 Writ jurisdiction was held inappropriate for challenging the tax assessment because an efficacious statutory revision remedy was available and the dispute involved factual questions better left to the departmental authorities. The assessment orders were therefore not interfered with, and the petitioner was relegated to the statutory forum. By contrast, the recovery demand notices and bank account attachments were quashed because the statutory protection and the limited period remaining after service of the appellate order made immediate coercive action premature. Liberty was reserved to proceed in accordance with law after expiry of the statutory period. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 21 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159497