<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (8) TMI 324 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159496</link>
    <description>Under an industrial sales tax exemption scheme, a slight delay in filing the exemption application was not treated as an automatic ground for refusal, because rigid insistence on time limits would frustrate the policy objective. The Court also held that rejection for an incomplete Director of Industries certificate was improper without first giving the applicant a reasonable opportunity to cure the defect. In the absence of clear government guidelines, certification could be worked out with reference to the Central Government registration certificate for medium and large industries. The rejection orders were quashed and the matters remitted for fresh consideration after allowing defect correction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:15:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (8) TMI 324 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159496</link>
      <description>Under an industrial sales tax exemption scheme, a slight delay in filing the exemption application was not treated as an automatic ground for refusal, because rigid insistence on time limits would frustrate the policy objective. The Court also held that rejection for an incomplete Director of Industries certificate was improper without first giving the applicant a reasonable opportunity to cure the defect. In the absence of clear government guidelines, certification could be worked out with reference to the Central Government registration certificate for medium and large industries. The rejection orders were quashed and the matters remitted for fresh consideration after allowing defect correction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>