<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 347 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159480</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the transactions were works contracts and not taxable under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act. Consequently, the penalty under section 12(3) was not applicable. The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s petitions, finding no error in the Tribunal&#039;s approach and denying the enhancement petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:41:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 347 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159480</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the transactions were works contracts and not taxable under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act. Consequently, the penalty under section 12(3) was not applicable. The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s petitions, finding no error in the Tribunal&#039;s approach and denying the enhancement petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>