<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 341 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159465</link>
    <description>Tax exemption under section 13-B of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 was treated as a conditional concession, and the accompanying rules allowing cancellation of the exemption or entitlement certificate and recovery of exempted tax if the industrial unit ceased business or remained closed were described as serving a legitimate anti-abuse purpose. The retrospective challenge was noted to fail because the liability flowed from the conditions attached to the concession and the restriction was characterised as reasonable and non-arbitrary. The text also notes that a pre-deposit requirement before hearing the appeal on merits may be relaxed where substantial tax has already been recovered and the circumstances justify disposal of the appeal on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 18:27:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 341 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159465</link>
      <description>Tax exemption under section 13-B of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 was treated as a conditional concession, and the accompanying rules allowing cancellation of the exemption or entitlement certificate and recovery of exempted tax if the industrial unit ceased business or remained closed were described as serving a legitimate anti-abuse purpose. The retrospective challenge was noted to fail because the liability flowed from the conditions attached to the concession and the restriction was characterised as reasonable and non-arbitrary. The text also notes that a pre-deposit requirement before hearing the appeal on merits may be relaxed where substantial tax has already been recovered and the circumstances justify disposal of the appeal on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>