<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 347 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159459</link>
    <description>A person purchasing chillies from local cultivators for outside-State principals was held liable for purchase tax because the substance of the transaction showed that it acted as a purchasing agent for the principals. The broad definition of &quot;dealer&quot; under section 2(f) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1959 covered a person buying goods for commission, remuneration or otherwise, and the assessee could not avoid liability by characterising the arrangement as agency for both sides. The facts also showed that the purchases were arranged for despatch through a common carrier and the tax recovered from principals was accounted for in the books. The reference was answered in favour of tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 18:05:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 347 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159459</link>
      <description>A person purchasing chillies from local cultivators for outside-State principals was held liable for purchase tax because the substance of the transaction showed that it acted as a purchasing agent for the principals. The broad definition of &quot;dealer&quot; under section 2(f) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1959 covered a person buying goods for commission, remuneration or otherwise, and the assessee could not avoid liability by characterising the arrangement as agency for both sides. The facts also showed that the purchases were arranged for despatch through a common carrier and the tax recovered from principals was accounted for in the books. The reference was answered in favour of tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>