<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (7) TMI 322 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159452</link>
    <description>Promissory estoppel did not support the claim for sales tax deferment and cash subsidy because the incentive resolutions, read together, disclosed no clear assurance that all industries outside the later exclusions would receive benefits, and no bona fide reliance altering position was proved. The eligibility certificate issued by the Industries Commissioner was only part of the administrative incentive scheme and did not bind the sales tax authorities or override their statutory powers. The challenge to denial of incentive benefits was therefore rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 17:21:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (7) TMI 322 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159452</link>
      <description>Promissory estoppel did not support the claim for sales tax deferment and cash subsidy because the incentive resolutions, read together, disclosed no clear assurance that all industries outside the later exclusions would receive benefits, and no bona fide reliance altering position was proved. The eligibility certificate issued by the Industries Commissioner was only part of the administrative incentive scheme and did not bind the sales tax authorities or override their statutory powers. The challenge to denial of incentive benefits was therefore rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>