<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1308 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240131</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted stay without pre-deposit to the applicant, a franchisee of BCCI, in a service tax dispute. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant on major issues, including revenue share, payments to foreign players and support staff, sale of space for advertisement, and excess Cenvat credit. It held that the joint business arrangement with BCCI did not constitute a service, waiving the balance dues for appeal admission and allowing stay on collection of balance dues during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1308 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240131</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted stay without pre-deposit to the applicant, a franchisee of BCCI, in a service tax dispute. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant on major issues, including revenue share, payments to foreign players and support staff, sale of space for advertisement, and excess Cenvat credit. It held that the joint business arrangement with BCCI did not constitute a service, waiving the balance dues for appeal admission and allowing stay on collection of balance dues during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>