<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1304 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240127</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s allegations of undervaluation of services provided by the applicant, confirming service tax amounts under &#039;Site Formation Service&#039; and &#039;Mining Service,&#039; along with penalties and denial of Cenvat credit. Despite the applicant&#039;s argument that service tax should be based on consideration received, the Tribunal found suppression of service value and disagreed with the applicant&#039;s interpretation of the law. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s stance on tax liability prior to 01-06-2007 for services rendered, emphasizing the need for service tax payment pre-2007. Despite financial hardships faced by the applicant, a pre-deposit amount was ordered with the waiver of the balance dues pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1304 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240127</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s allegations of undervaluation of services provided by the applicant, confirming service tax amounts under &#039;Site Formation Service&#039; and &#039;Mining Service,&#039; along with penalties and denial of Cenvat credit. Despite the applicant&#039;s argument that service tax should be based on consideration received, the Tribunal found suppression of service value and disagreed with the applicant&#039;s interpretation of the law. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s stance on tax liability prior to 01-06-2007 for services rendered, emphasizing the need for service tax payment pre-2007. Despite financial hardships faced by the applicant, a pre-deposit amount was ordered with the waiver of the balance dues pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>